The idea of dividing the stadium for the benefit of the match organizer
Always in the Egyptian Derby, from some time I play at Cairo Stadium, and it is divided by text between the fans of Al-Ahly and Zamalek
Zamalek fans are on the right and Al-Ahly fans are in the north equally.
The closest international example is Milan's Derby, between Inter Milan and AC Milan, and the Derby will play on the same stadium as Giuseppe or (San Siro), according to what they like to call the Milan fans
In Derby, the owner of the land will take the largest part of the stands, and a small part will be for the fans of the opposing team
The same thing happens in Argentina in the Super Clasico between Boca Juniors and River Plate, but on a different stadium because each team has its own stadium.
Boca Juniors in the bomponera stadium and River Plate in the Monumental Stadium
And this issue is in my hands of great preference for the owner of the land because the competitor will play under great public pressure from the competing fans, and you really feel that he is the owner of the land, not just speaking in the name or just income by the club.
- For example, if the match is for Zamalek, the fans of Al-Ahly will remain in the first, north, and the same thing. If the match is for Al-Ahly, the fans of Zamalek remain in the first right, and if places are allocated for the audience in a certain way, it will be (fully listed for the audience) because in the match of the Super Clasico matches in the (Monemontal Stadium) audience The Boca was in the next right in the upper stand and took advantage of the opportunity and threw fire on the fans of the River in the lower stand :)
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق